Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39522002›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2024

The Comprehensive Resilience-building psychosocial Intervention (CREST) for people with dementia in the community: a feasibility and acceptability study.

Dympna Casey, Priscilla Doyle, Niamh Gallagher, Grace O'Sullivan, Siobhán Smyth, Declan Devane, Kathy Murphy, Charlotte Clarke, Bob Woods, Rose-Marie Dröes and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Dympna CaseySchool of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Galway, Áras Moyola, Galway, Ireland.
Priscilla DoyleSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Galway, Áras Moyola, Galway, Ireland.
Niamh GallagherSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Galway, Áras Moyola, Galway, Ireland.
Grace O'SullivanSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Galway, Áras Moyola, Galway, Ireland.
Siobhán SmythSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Galway, Áras Moyola, Galway, Ireland.
Declan DevaneSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Galway, Áras Moyola, Galway, Ireland.
Kathy MurphySchool of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Galway, Áras Moyola, Galway, Ireland.
Charlotte ClarkeSocial Sciences and Health, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Bob WoodsDementia Services Development Centre, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales.
Rose-Marie DröesAmsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gill WindleSchool of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales.
Andrew W MurphyHealth Research Board Primary Care Clinical Trials Network Ireland, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Tony FoleyDepartment of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Fergus TimmonsThe Alzheimer Society of Ireland, Temple Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland.
Paddy GillespieCentre for Research in Medical Devices (CÚRAM, SFI 13/RC/2073_P2) and Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Anna HobbinsCentre for Research in Medical Devices (CÚRAM, SFI 13/RC/2073_P2) and Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
John NewellSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Jaynal AbedinSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Christine DomeganJ.E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Kate IrvingSchool of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Barbara WhelanSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Galway, Áras Moyola, Galway, Ireland. barbara.whelan@universityofgalway.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0612-666X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA dementia diagnosis can lead to a decline in cognitive, social, and physical health, but people with dementia can live meaningful lives and participate actively in society with psychosocial support. This single-arm, non-randomised feasibility study explored the feasibility and acceptability of a Comprehensive REsilience-building psychoSocial intervenTion (CREST) for people with dementia, their caregivers, General Practitioners (GPs), and the public.

methodsNine people with dementia and their primary caregivers living in the community (n = 9 dyads) completed the CREST intervention which had three components (cognitive stimulation therapy [CST], physical exercise, and dementia education). Quantitative secondary outcomes were assessed at baseline and following the 15-week intervention; qualitative interviews were conducted during and post-intervention. All study components were assessed against pre-defined criteria, to determine the feasibility of conducting a future definitive trial.

resultsRecruitment of people with dementia and their caregiver was a significant challenge and led to considerable delays to the onset and conduct of the intervention. Only 13% of eligible GP practices agreed to assist in recruitment and achieved a 6% enrolment rate; a community-based recruitment strategy proved more effective, yielding a 29% enrolment rate. However, once recruited, participants maintained high attendance and adherence to the content of each component with average adherence rates of 98% for CST, exercise sessions and caregiver education. Adherence to secondary exercise measures was lower, with home exercise diary completion at 37% and Fitbit wear adherence at 80% during the day and 67% at night. The people with dementia felt their concentration and fitness had improved over the 15-week intervention and particularly enjoyed the social aspects (e.g. group classes, exercising with partners from the community). Caregivers felt they had better knowledge and understanding following their education component and reported that the social aspects (interacting and sharing experiences with each other) were important. Overall, participants reported that the three components of the intervention were feasible and acceptable. In addition, the quantitative measures and health economic tools employed were feasible. However, the secondary elements of the exercise component (recording home exercise diaries and Fitbit use) were not considered feasible. Overall, pre-defined criteria for progression to a definitive intervention were fulfilled in terms of acceptability, retention and fidelity but not recruitment.

conclusionWhile overall, the CREST intervention was feasible and acceptable to participants, significant difficulties with recruitment of people with dementia and their caregiver through GP practices impacted the viability of delivering the intervention. Recruitment through community-based groups proved a more feasible option and further work is needed to overcome barriers to recruiting this cohort before a larger-scale trial can be conducted.

trial registrationISRCTN25294519.

Indexed as

CSTDementiaEducationExercisePsychosocial intervention

Identifiers

PMID39522002
PMCPMC11549834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.