ArticleBMC emergency medicine2024
Predictive score for diagnosing acute colonic diverticulitis in the emergency department: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute diverticulitis is commonly misdiagnosed among patients with acute abdominal pain in the emergency department (ED). There are predictive scores that assist in the diagnosis of acute left-sided diverticulitis, but no scoring system is available for diagnosing acute diverticulitis without regard to the affected side. Therefore, developing a predictive score for diagnosing acute diverticulitis that is not limited to the left side will guide physicians in making a diagnosis and increase the appropriateness of computed tomography. This study aimed to establish a predictive score for diagnosing acute diverticulitis.
methodThis single-centre retrospective study included adult patients (≥ 18 years) who presented to the ED with acute abdominal pain. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify essential factors for diagnosing acute diverticulitis, and the Akaike information criterion was calculated to identify significant predictive factors for diagnosing acute diverticulitis using a clinical scoring system.
resultsOf 424 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 72 (17%) were diagnosed with acute diverticulitis. The significant factors associated with acute diverticulitis were age ≥ 60 years (adjusted odds ratio (adj.OR) 2.23, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20 - 4.14, p = 0.01), duration of abdominal pain ≥ 48 h (adj.OR 2.64, 95% CI: 1.28 - 5.45, p = 0.017), history of a diverticulum (adj.OR 7.77, 95% CI: 3.27 - 18.45, p < 0.001), absence of nausea and vomiting (adj.OR 3.42, 95% CI: 1.65 - 7.10, p < 0.001), absence of anorexia (adj.OR 3.33, 95% CI: 1.34 - 8.33, p = 0.026), absence of tachycardia (adj.OR 3.51, 95% CI: 1.39 - 8.87, p = 0.003), and abdominal guarding (adj.OR 2.99, 95% CI: 1.52 - 5.91, p = 0.002). These predictive factors were converted into predictive scores for diagnosing acute diverticulitis. For the score of ≥ 4, the sensitivity and specificity were 73.24% (95% CI: 0.61-0.83) and 80.40% (95% CI: 0.76-0.84), respectively, and the negative predictive value was 93.71% (95% CI: 0.90-0.96). No significant signs, symptoms, or laboratory findings were associated with complicated diverticulitis.
conclusionPredictive factors for diagnosing acute diverticulitis included age ≥ 60 years, duration of abdominal pain ≥ 48 h, history of a diverticulum, abdominal guarding, and absence of nausea and vomiting, anorexia, and tachycardia. A predictive score ≥ 4 suggested the presence of acute diverticulitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.