ArticleBMC surgery2024
Comparison of strategies based on DTI visualisation for stereotactic minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of moderate-volume thalamo-basal ganglia cerebral haemorrhage: a protocol for a multicenter prospective study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diffusion tensor imaging assessments to investigate motor impairment recovery after minor basal ganglia hemorrhage post-stereotactic surgery.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- CTA and DTI combined with robot-assisted puncture external drainage improves clinical efficacy for mild basal ganglia haematoma.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) is a condition associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and disability, particularly among the elderly population. The management of moderate thalamic-basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhage primarily relies on conservative approaches. Nevertheless, the rate of long-term disability remains high. In recent years, there has been significant advancement in minimally invasive surgery and diffusion tensor imaging techniques. Consequently, the utilization of Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) technology in patients with cerebral haemorrhage allows for the identification of the haematoma's location in relation to the Corticospinal Tract (CST). This enables the development of precise puncture pathways that can be visualized, thereby avoiding any potential damage to the CST. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) is a method used to assess the structural and physiological characteristics of biological tissue by examining the diffusion behavior of water molecules.In the central nervous system, limb paralysis will be inevitable if the corticospinal tract is damaged. By employing DTI imaging techniques on individuals, it becomes possible to visualize the spatial relationship between the hematoma and the CST. This approach allows avoidance of the CST during preoperative planning of the puncture path, thus reducing secondary injuries caused by the procedure. The primary objective of this study was to assess the ability of patients in the minimally invasive surgery group and the conservative group to perform activities of daily living after 6 months of treatment. In addition, secondary outcomes included assessment of hematoma resorption/clearance ratios, cytokine levels, complication rates, and therapeutic indexes at different treatment durations, as well as long-term safety and efficacy at 2-3 years of follow-up. Furthermore, subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analysis were conducted to further analyze the data. Logistic single-variate and multivariate regression analyses were applied to understand the adverse factors affecting prognosis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The clinical study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the First People's Hospital of Yibin. The ethical number is: 2023 Review (64). REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol is registered in the Prospective Registry of Chinese Clinical Trial Registries (PROCCTR). The full date of first registration is 28/12/2023. The registration number for PROCCTR is ChiCTR2300079252.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.