ArticleScientific reports2024
Novel laser model of optic nerve transection provides valuable insights about the dynamics of optic nerve regeneration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multifunctional nanoplatforms for optic nerve regeneration integrating anti-inflammatory, epigenetic, and ionic mechanisms with emerging artificial intelligence technologies.Cell biology and toxicology · 2025Review
- Case Series of Retinal Damage Caused by Laser Pointer.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optic nerve (ON) injury causes blindness in adult mammals as their retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) cannot regenerate axons. However, amphibian RGC axons do not experience the same regenerative failure. Studying the regeneration process of the ON in amphibians holds profound implications for regenerative medicine and human health. Using transgenic tadpoles and laser micro-optics, we developed a reproducible ON transection and regeneration model. Through microscopy of axon dynamics, functional testing to assess visual pathway recovery, TUNEL cell death and EdU cell proliferation assays, and RNA-seq of the retina and optic nerve, we characterized the optic nerve injury response and subsequent recovery. Our model suggests no chemoattractant gradient exists early in regeneration, with defasciculated axons sprouting in random directions from the globe-proximal cut end. Once individual axons reach the appropriate targets in the brain, their tract is reinforced by other regenerating axons, restoring normal ON morphology. Thus, guidance cues or scaffolding from brain-innervating axons likely support later stages of regeneration. After 14 days, the regenerated ON is morphologically indistinguishable from the naïve ON, and visual function is restored. We found no evidence of RGC death or new RGC formation in the model, suggesting that ON regeneration involves remodeling of injured axons of pre-existing RGCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.