ArticleScientific reports2024
Self-learning salp swarm algorithm for global optimization and its application in multi-layer perceptron model training.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DMARS_WGO: a deep reinforcement-driven hybrid metaheuristic for intelligent adaptive optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- FBCA: Flexible Besiege and Conquer Algorithm for Multi-Layer Perceptron Optimization Problems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An Enhanced Knowledge Salp Swarm Algorithm for Solving the Numerical Optimization and Seed Classification Tasks.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimization problems are common across various fields, and one effective solution is the swarm intelligence algorithm.It is essential for the algorithm to deliver high-quality solutions for problems with varying characteristics. However, most existing swarm intelligence rely on fixed and monotonic search strategies, which limits their ability to handle the diverse and complex situations encountered when solving real-world optimization problems with unknown fitness landscapes. To extend the applicability of swarm intelligence and thus offer users an efficient black-box optimizer for various applications, a novel self-learning mechanism is proposed and applied to the Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA) to develop the self-learning salp swarm algorithm (SLSSA) in this paper. In SLSSA, four distinct search strategies, including a novel multiple food sources search strategy, are adopted to strengthen the search agents' abilities to conquer various difficulties in the search space. To improve the efficiency of the search process, the self-learning strategy dynamically determines the execution probability of each search strategy according to the quality of solutions it produced previously. Moreover, a parameter setting method is proposed in this paper, which eliminates the need for a trial-and-error approach and allows for straightforward configuration of the parameters that optimize the performance of SLSSA. In comparison with several highly regarded state-of-the-art peer algorithms, the performance of SLSSA in solving the CEC2014 benchmark functions was thoroughly examined. Subsequently, SLSSA was applied to train multi-layer perceptron classifiers and test on the UCI machine-learning datasets. The experimental results and analysis on benchmark functions and multi-layer perceptron classifier training problems demonstrate that SLSSA outperforms the competing algorithms in terms of solution accuracy, stability, and overall convergence speed. Moreover, computational time comparisons reveal that SLSSA achieves significant performance improvement with only a marginal increase in time cost compared to the original SSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.