ArticleScientific reports2024
Research on temperature prediction model of molten steel of tundish in continuous casting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To achieve the desired superheat of molten steel during the continuous casting process, optimization of process parameters such as molten steel temperature in ladle furnace, casting speed, and baking temperature is necessary. Therefore, obtaining the superheat corresponding to these process parameters in advance is particularly important. To address this issue, a model for predicting the temperature of molten steel in the tundish during continuous casting is designed. The model adopts a combined modeling approach of mechanistic model and data model. To address the issue of the mechanism model's inability to capture the variation of the lining's thermal parameters, this article improves the traditional physics-informed neural network (PINN) algorithm. It combines the constraints from both the forward and inverse problems, allowing for obtaining solutions to the equations while capturing the variation of equation parameters. Actual data from multiple casting sequences at a steel plant are collected to validate the accuracy and interpretability of the model. The results show that the error of the model is about 2.1k which has better accuracy compared to pure mechanistic model and pure data model. Additionally, it can capture the variation patterns of tundish lining thermal parameters under different operating conditions. Therefore, the model designed in this article can provide both profound physical interpretation ability and more practical predictions of molten steel temperature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.