ArticleScientific reports2024
Differences in cardiac mechanics assessed by left ventricular hemodynamic forces in athletes and patients with hypertension.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of noninvasive pressure-volume loops derived from cardiac magnetic resonance and transthoracic echocardiography in normal subjects.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hemodynamic forces derived from cine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: technical aspects, applications in various clinical scenarios, and in athlete's heart.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Comparison of left ventricular hemodynamic forces measured by transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intradialytic Changes and Prognostic Value of Ventriculo-Arterial Coupling in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: Protocol for an Observational Prospective Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- An Innovative Artificial Intelligence Classification Model for Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Utilizing Cardiac Biomechanics Derived from Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mechano-electrical-fluid interaction left-ventricle model for numerical evaluation of aortic valve hemodynamics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We sought to assess cardiac magnetic resonance derived left ventricular hemodynamic forces (HDF) in athletes compared to patients with hypertension. Sixty athletes and 48 hypertensive patients were studied. HDF were measured during the entire cardiac cycle, the systolic phase, suction, early LV filling, and atrial thrust. Statistical comparisons were made between athletes and hypertensive patients, and between endurance and strength athletes. The slope of the systolic ejection was higher in athletes compared to hypertensive patients (541.5 vs. 435 1/sec; p = 0.033). Athletes showed higher HDF during the first phase of systole (4.53 vs. 3.86; p = 0.047) and the systolic impulse (11.26 vs. 8.76; p = 0.045). Compared to hypertensive patients, the AUC of the elastic rebound in athletes was lower (-0.31 vs. -0.44; p = 0.011). Moreover, hypertensive patients had an abnormal suction as revealed by a divergent direction (apex-to-base) of the HDF. The atrial thrust was higher in hypertensive patients than in athletes (-0.31 vs. -0.05; p < 0.001). Compared to endurance athletes, strength athletes had a shorter duration of the systolic impulse (250 vs. 280 ms; p = 0.019) and higher AUC during the early LV filling (1.65 vs. 0.97; p = 0.016). We conclude that HDF allows distinction between the hemodynamic patterns of athletes and patients with hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.