Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39521854›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Combined response of polar magnetotaxis to oxygen and pH: Insights from hanging drop assays and microcosm experiments.

Xuegang Mao, Ramon Egli, Nikolai Petersen, Xiuming Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xuegang MaoKey Laboratory for Humid Subtropical Ecogeographical Processes of the Ministry of Education, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350117, China. maoxuegang1@163.com.
Ramon EgliDepartment of General Geophysics and Conrad Observatory, GeoSphere Austria, Hohe Warte 38, 1190, Vienna, Austria. ramon.egli@geosphere.at.
Nikolai PetersenDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Theresienstrasse 41, 80333, Munich, Germany.
Xiuming LiuKey Laboratory for Humid Subtropical Ecogeographical Processes of the Ministry of Education, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350117, China.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EG 294/1-1 and EG 294/2-1National Natural Science Foundation of China 41602184, 42130507, 41772180Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2020J01141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) combine passive alignment with the Earth magnetic field with a chemotactic response (magneto-chemotaxis) to reach their optimal living depth in chemically stratified environments. Current magneto-aerotaxis models fail to explain the occurrence of MTB far below the oxic-anoxic interface and the coexistence of MTB cells with opposite magnetotactic polarity at depths that are unrelated with the redox gradient. Here we propose a modified model of polar magnetotaxis which explains these observations, as well as the distinct concentration profiles and magnetotactic advantages of two types of MTB inhabiting a freshwater sediment: a group of unidentified cocci (MC), and a giant rod-shaped bacterium (MB) apparently identical to M. bavaricum (MB). This model assumed that magnetotactic polarity is set by a threshold mechanism in counter gradients of oxygen and a second group of repellents, with, in case of MB, includes H

Indexed as

ChemotaxisOxygenGeologic SedimentsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMagnetic FieldsOxidation-ReductionOxygen

Identifiers

PMID39521854
PMCPMC11550849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.