ArticleScientific reports2024
Understanding complex systems through differential causal networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Persistent homology of blood gene co-expression networks reveals reduced cycle structure in autism spectrum disorder: a multi-cohort analysis.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Article
- Differential causal networks highlight sex-based differences in human tissues.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Pan-Cancer Upregulation of theGenes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the evolving landscape of data science and computational biology, Causal Networks (CNs) have emerged as a robust framework for modelling causal relationships among elements of complex systems derived from experimental data. CNs can efficiently model causal relationships emerging in a single system while comparing multiple systems, allowing to understand rewiring in different cells, tissues, and physiological states with a deeper perspective. Despite the existence of network models, namely differential networks, that have been used to compare coexpression and correlation structures, causality needs to be introduced in differential analysis to robustly provide direction to the edges of such networks, in order to better understand the flows of information, and also to better intervene in their functioning, for example for agricultural or pharmacological purposes. Resolved to reach this ambitious goal, we introduce Differential Causal Networks (DCNs), a novel framework that represents differences between two existing CNs. A DCN is obtained from experimental data by comparing two CNs, and it is a power tool for highlighting differences in causal relations. After a careful definition and design of DCNs, we test our algorithm to model possible differential causal relationships between genes responsible for the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus-related pathologies considering patients' sex at the tissue level. DCNs allowed us to shed light on causal differences between sexes across nine tissues. We also compare differences among three possible definitions of DCNs to highlight similarities and differences of biological importance. Code, Data and Supplementary Information are available at https://github.com/hguzzi/DifferentialCausalNetworks .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.