ArticleScientific reports2024
Impact of bioinoculants on growth enhancement, physicochemical characteristics, biochemical profiles, and enzymatic defense mechanisms in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum).
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microbial Inoculation Strategies for Optimal Cherry Tomato Production.Physiologia plantarumArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The excessive use of fungicides in agriculture causes challenges like pathogen resistance, soil and water contamination, and potential health risks. Sustainable options like Pseudomonas spp. and yeast are being explored as bioinoculants to promote plant growth and inhibit fungal proliferation. 87 isolates, comprising 36 fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. and 51 yeast isolates were obtained from healthy fruits and vegetables. Yeast (YFSL) and Pseudomonas (PFSL) isolates significantly (p < 0.05) inhibited the in-vitro growth of Fusarium solani and Drechslera sp. Experiments in a screen house for 90 days used a randomized block design to study the effects of bioinoculants on plant and fruit health. Moreover, plants and fruits treated with these bioinoculants showed increased levels of salicylic acid (66.14%), total phenolic content (59.67%), chlorophyll (24.31%), carbohydrates (40.38%), phosphorus (0.24%), and antioxidant activity (90%). The treatments displayed higher levels of plant defensive enzymes, chitinase (0.09 mg/h/protein) and β-1-3-glucanase (0.093 mg/h/protein). The increased concentrations of antioxidant enzymes like SOD (0.07 U/L), POD (0.23 U/L), and APX (0.24 U/L) were also observed in the fruits of bio-inoculated plants. However., the difference in results was non-significant (P ≤ 0.05). This study demonstrates the Efficacy of bioinoculants in improving plant growth, compositional characteristics, and antioxidant activities while reducing losses in tomato plants and fruits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.