ArticleScientific reports2024
Pregnancy outcomes of twin pregnancies with cervical insufficiency undergoing cervical cerclage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Braided Polyester Sutures with Different Manufacturing Characteristics in Cervical Cerclage: A Pilot Study Comparing Obstetric Outcomes and Operative Characteristics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Pessary Placement, Cervical Cerclage, or Expectant Management in Preventing Preterm Delivery in Twin Pregnancies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Delayed-Interval Delivery in Multifetal In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Pregnancies: Two Case Reports.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cervical cerclage is an established procedure for treating cervical insufficiency; however, its efficacy in twin pregnancies remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of transvaginal cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies complicated by cervical insufficiency. Data were retrospectively collected from 155 women with twin pregnancies diagnosed with cervical insufficiency. Participants were divided into two groups: the cerclage group (n = 131) and the non-cerclage group (n = 24). The cerclage group was further subdivided into emergency cerclage and ultrasound-indicated cerclage subgroups for detailed analysis. The duration of gestation was found to be longer in the cerclage group compared to the non-cerclage group. Procedures performed included both emergency and ultrasound-indicated cerclage. No significant difference in gestational outcomes was observed between the ultrasound-indicated cerclage subgroup and the non-cerclage group, regardless of cervical length (< 15 mm, < 25 mm, or 15-25 mm). In contrast, a significant improvement in gestational outcomes was noted in the emergency cerclage subgroup compared to the non-cerclage group, irrespective of cervical dilation (> 1 cm or ≤ 1 cm). Overall, cervical cerclage appears to improve pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies under specific conditions. While ultrasonographically indicated cerclage did not significantly enhance pregnancy outcomes, emergency cerclage may be effective in improving perinatal prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.