ArticleScientific reports2024
A classification system based on improved global exploration and convergence to examine student psychological fitness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A study on the correlations between parent-child interaction, school adaptation type, and adolescent mental health.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Drama-based simulations in first aid education: psychometric validation of a student assessment tool in school settings.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Coverage and connectivity maximization for wireless sensor networks using improved chaotic grey wolf optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anxiety is an important issue that affects their academic performance, mental health, and overall educational journey. To address this issue, it is important to accurately assess anxiety levels and provide evidence-based techniques. However, due to the complexity of anxiety and individual differences, analyzing clustering algorithms to efficiently classify psychological levels is challenging. Traditional clustering techniques face certain challenges in accurately classifying anxiety levels, such as slow convergence, sensitivity to initial conditions, and difficulties in handling constraints. To address these issues, clustering with an improved Mayfly-based optimization algorithm (IMOA) is proposed based on the dynamic variable for better performance to classify psychological levels. Initially, IMOA is validated using 23 standard benchmark functions, confirming its ability to find optimal solutions. Then, IMOA is applied to the student dataset, classifying them into Cluster A and Cluster B. The average scores for both clusters across all test cases are 76.7% and 53.07%, respectively. These results demonstrate the formation of dissimilar student groups with homogeneous emotions and performance, highlighting the importance of addressing emotional stress. Finally, by assigning students to clusters, educators and mental health professionals can better support those who may struggle, ensuring they receive the attention and resources they need. The obtained results show that IMOA with a dynamic variable effectively classifies student anxiety, improving the learning environment and helping teachers better understand students' needs. This identification allows them to provide more effective support and adapt their teaching to meet the specific needs of those seeking support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.