ArticleScientific reports2024
Fusing global context with multiscale context for enhanced breast cancer classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- MMBCFNet: multi modal hybrid deep learning framework for breast cancer detection using MRI, mammography, and ultrasound images.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Article
- Multimodal transformers predict cancer therapy response from tumor mechanics.Array (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- The result prediction of fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancer patients based on machine learning and deep learning models: a multicenter study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Multi-scale information bottleneck with confidence-weighted decision fusion for robust breast ultrasound lesion classification.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Numerical Interpretation of Variation Indices of Tumor Outline Tracking Using Artificial Intelligence Mapping.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2026Article
- FastColitisDetector-XAI: An efficient AI model utilizing sparse Autoencoder with explainable AI for ulcerative colitis diagnosis.MethodsX · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is the second most common type of cancer among women. Prompt detection of breast cancer can impede its advancement to more advanced phases, thereby elevating the probability of favorable treatment consequences. Histopathological images are commonly used for breast cancer classification due to their detailed cellular information. Existing diagnostic approaches rely on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) which are limited to local context resulting in a lower classification accuracy. Therefore, we present a fusion model composed of a Vision Transformer (ViT) and custom Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP) network with an attention mechanism for effectively classifying breast cancer from histopathological images. ViT enables the model to attain global features, while the ASPP network accommodates multiscale features. Fusing the features derived from the models resulted in a robust breast cancer classifier. With the help of five-stage image preprocessing technique, the proposed model achieved 100% accuracy in classifying breast cancer on the BreakHis dataset at 100X and 400X magnification factors. On 40X and 200X magnifications, the model achieved 99.25% and 98.26% classification accuracy respectively. With a commendable classification efficacy on histopathological images, the model can be considered a dependable option for proficient breast cancer classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.