Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39521747›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2025

eTWST: An Extension to the Timed Water Swallow Test for Increased Dysphagia Screening Accuracy.

Louise Brage, Fredrik Nylén, Patricia Hägglund, Thorbjörn Holmlund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Examining swallowing parameters of the Yale Swallow Protocol in healthy individuals: Establishing Normative Data.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Louise BrageSpeech and Language Pathology Department of Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, 90187, Umeå, Sweden. louise.brage@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7434-9750
Fredrik NylénSpeech and Language Pathology Department of Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, 90187, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3373-0934
Patricia HägglundSpeech and Language Pathology Department of Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, 90187, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2254-7862
Thorbjörn HolmlundOtorhinolaryngology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Umeå University, 90187, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7005-3579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to fine-tuning the Timed Water Swallow Test (TWST) screening procedure to provide the most reliable prediction of the Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) assessment outcomes, with age, sex, and the presence of clinical signs of dysphagia being considered in the assessment. Participants were healthy people and patients with suspected dysphagia. TWST performance and participants' reported dysphagia symptoms were assessed in terms of their utility in predicting the outcome of a FEES assessment the same day. The FEES assessors were blinded to the nature of the TWST performance. The water swallowing capacity levels and clinical observations during a screening performance that were indicative of dysphagia/no symptoms in FEES were determined. Convergent validity was assessed as the agreement with the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) in the FEES assessment. TWST predicted FEES findings (aspiration and dysphagia) with a sensitivity of 72 and 45% and a specificity of 75% and 80%, respectively. Extended analysis of the TWST procedure (eTWST) identified aspiration (sensitivity = 92%, specificity = 62%) and dysphagia (sensitivity = 70%, and specificity = 72%) more accurately and showed a high correlation with FOIS (ɸ = 0.37). Excellent inter-rater reliability was further observed (Kw = 0.83). The extended evaluation of TWST performance has superior criterion validity to that of TWST. eTWST displayed high convergent validity and excellent interrater reliability. We therefore believe that eTWST can be highly relevant for clinical dysphagia screening.

Indexed as

DeglutitionDeglutition DisordersMass ScreeningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityWaterWaterDeglutitionDysphagia screeningFlexible endoscopic evaluationof swallowingWater swallow test

Identifiers

PMID39521747
PMCPMC12328515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.