Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39521739›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025

Immunohistochemical Status Predicts Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-Overexpressing Breast Cancers.

Leah Winer, Karen J Ruth, Richard J Bleicher, Rajeswari Nagarathinam, Melissa McShane, Andrea S Porpiglia, Mary T Pronovost, Allison Aggon, Austin D Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leah WinerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Karen J RuthBiostatistics Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Richard J BleicherDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rajeswari NagarathinamDepartment of Pathology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Melissa McShaneDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Andrea S PorpigliaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mary T PronovostDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Allison AggonDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Austin D WilliamsDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Austin.Williams@fccc.edu.

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Eric Andrew Ross · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927U.S. Public Health Service P30CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression (HER2+) is defined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) as IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+. Response differences to neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy (NT) in IHC3+ versus IHC2+/ISH+ breast cancer patients are poorly characterized. We explored whether pathologic complete response (pCR) varies by HER2 IHC status.

methodsPatients with stage I-III HER2+ breast cancer undergoing NT and surgery between 2013 and 2020 were identified from the National Cancer Database and stratified by IHC status. Breast and nodal pCR were analyzed.

resultsOf 40,711 HER2+ patients, 83% were IHC3+ and 17% were IHC2+/ISH+. IHC3+ patients were more likely to be hormone receptor (HR)-negative (33 vs. 21%), have cT3/4 tumors (24 vs. 21%), and be cN+ (52 vs. 47%; all p < 0.0001). Breast conservation rates were similar (each 43%, p = 0.32), although IHC3+ axillary lymph node dissection rates were lower (41 vs. 45%, p < 0.0001). Among all patients, breast pCR was 49%, while nodal pCR was 64%. Compared with IHC2+/ISH+, IHC3+ had higher unadjusted breast (54 vs. 22%, p < 0.0001) and nodal (69 vs. 37%, p < 0.0001) pCR rates. When stratified by HR status, pCR was lower for HR+ disease but remained higher among IHC3+ patients. Analysis of T1cN0 primaries mirrored these trends. In multivariable analysis, IHC3+ remained an independent predictor of breast (odds ratio [OR] 3.91, confidence interval [CI] 3.65-4.19, p < 0.0001) and nodal (OR 3.40, CI 3.12-3.71, p < 0.0001) pCR.

conclusionHER2 IHC status predicts pCR and may help select breast cancer patients who derive the greatest benefit from NT. These findings provide further evidence that revision of HER2 classification may improve clinical management.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmunohistochemistryNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPathologic Complete ResponsePrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBreast cancerHuman epidermal growth factor (HER2)Immunohistochemistry (IHC)In situ hybridization (ISH)Pathologic complete response (pCR)

Identifiers

PMID39521739
PMCPMC11698782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.