ArticleBMJ open2024
Combination of body mass index and body fat percentage in middle and late pregnancy to predict pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes in Wenzhou, China: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe present study aimed to evaluate whether body mass index (BMI) and body fat percentage (BFP) could be used to predict pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingWenzhou Medical University Affiliated Second Hospital (Zhejiang Province, China). Clinical data were collected from electronic medical records.
participantsData from 683 patients with GDM admitted to the Wenzhou Medical University Affiliated Second Hospital between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively analysed. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy outcomes.
resultsThe results showed that pregnant women with BFP ≥33% were more prone to abnormal amniotic fluid volume, abnormal blood pressure and anaemia (p<0.05). Additionally, these patients were more likely to experience postpartum haemorrhage and macrosomia, as well as risk factors associated with caesarean section at labour (p<0.05). BMI exhibited a strong predictive value for abnormal blood pressure (OR 1.170; 95% CI 1.090 to 1.275), anaemia (OR 1.073; 95% CI 1.016 to 1.134), caesarean section (OR 1.150; 95% CI 1.096 to 1.208) and macrosomia (OR 1.169; 95% CI 1.063 to 1.285). Additionally, classified BFP had a predictive value for abnormal amniotic fluid volume (OR 3.196; 95% CI 1.294 to 7.894), abnormal blood pressure (OR 2.321; 95% CI 1.186 to 4.545), anaemia (OR 1.817; 95% CI 1.216 to 2.714), and caesarean section (OR 1.734; 95% CI 1.270 to 2.367).
conclusionsThe results suggest that patients with GDM with BFP ≥33% were more likely to experience unfavourable pregnancy outcomes, undergo caesarean section and develop macrosomia. The combination of BMI with classified BFP could better predict abnormal blood pressure and caesarean section in patients with GDM during the middle and late stages of pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.