ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025
Living on the edge: Role of adjuvant therapy after resection of primary lung cancer within 2 millimeters of a T-stage cutoff.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the use of systemic therapy and overall survival in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer whose pathologic tumor size was within 2 mm of a T-stage cutoff.
methodsThis was retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database of patients who underwent resection of tumors within 2 mm of the T1c/T2a, T2a/T2b, and T2b/T3 T-stage cutoffs. Patients with nodal involvement or whose T stage was determined on the basis of pathologic features other than tumor size were excluded. A multistate model compared the primary outcomes of systemic therapy and overall survival.
resultsFrom the National Cancer Database, 18,490 patients were identified: 9966 at the T1c/T2a cutoff, 5593 at the T2a/T2b cutoff, and 2931 at the T2b/T3 cutoff. Peaks in tumor size distribution occurred at 5-mm intervals. On the basis of an expected normalized curve, 2050 patients (11.1%) may have been understaged. Use of systemic therapy was greater among patients with larger tumors at the T1c/T2a cutoff (7.1% vs 8.9%; P < .001), the T2a/T2b cutoff (20.0% vs 25.5%; P < .001), and the T2b/T3 cutoff (31.2% vs 41.8%; P < .001). In a multistate model, mortality was greater above the T1c/T2a cutoff (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; P = .01), T2a/T2b cutoff (HR, 1.17; P < .01), and T2b/T3 cutoff (HR, 1.13; P = .03). In patients who received systemic therapy, this trend was eliminated (HR, 1.24; P = .14, HR, 0.79; P = .07, and HR, 1.23; P = .09, respectively).
conclusionsRounding of tumor size for pathologic staging is common. Although seemingly trivial, rounding may downstage patients and is associated with decreased rates of adjuvant therapy use and potentially worse overall survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.