ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2024
Joint suppression of cardiac bSSFP cine banding and flow artifacts using twofold phase-cycling and a dual-encoder neural network.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) cine imaging suffers from banding and flow artifacts induced by off-resonance. The work aimed to develop a twofold phase cycling sequence with a neural network-based reconstruction (2P-SSFP+Network) for a joint suppression of banding and flow artifacts in cardiac cine imaging.
methodsA dual-encoder neural network was trained on 1620 pairs of phase-cycled left ventricular (LV) cine images collected from 18 healthy subjects. Twenty healthy subjects and 25 patients were prospectively scanned using the proposed 2P-SSFP sequence. bSSFP cine of a single RF phase increment (1P-SSFP), bSSFP cine of a single radiofrequency (RF) phase increment with a network-based artifact reduction (1P-SSFP+Network), the averaging of the two phase-cycled images (2P-SSFP+Average), and the proposed method were mutually compared, in terms of artifact suppression performance in the LV, generalizability over altered scan parameters and scanners, suppression of large-area banding artifacts in the left atrium (LA), and accuracy of downstream segmentation tasks.
resultsIn the healthy subjects, 2P-SSFP+Network showed robust suppressions of artifacts across a range of phase combinations. Compared with 1P-SSFP and 2P-SSFP+Average, 2P-SSFP+Network improved banding artifacts (3.85 ± 0.67 and 4.50 ± 0.45 vs 5.00 ± 0.00, P < 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively), flow artifacts (3.35 ± 0.78 and 2.10 ± 0.77 vs 4.90 ± 0.20, both P < 0.01), and overall image quality (3.25 ± 0.51 and 2.30 ± 0.60 vs 4.75 ± 0.25, both P < 0.01). 1P-SSFP+Network and 2P-SSFP+Network achieved a similar artifact suppression performance, yet the latter had fewer hallucinations (two-chamber, 4.25 ± 0.51 vs 4.85 ± 0.45, P = 0.04; four-chamber, 3.45 ± 1.21 vs 4.65 ± 0.50, P = 0.03; and left atrium (LA), 3.35 ± 1.00 vs 4.65 ± 0.45, P < 0.01). Furthermore, in the pulmonary veins and LA, 1P-SSFP+Network could not eliminate banding artifacts since they occupied a large area, whereas 2P-SSFP+Network reliably suppressed the artifacts. In the downstream automated myocardial segmentation task, 2P-SSFP+Network achieved more accurate segmentations than 1P-SSFP with different phase increments.
conclusions2P-SSFP+Network jointly suppresses banding and flow artifacts while manifesting a good generalizability against variations of anatomy and scan parameters. It provides a feasible solution for robust suppression of the two types of artifacts in bSSFP cine imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.