Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39520983›Full record

ArticleMed (New York, N.Y.)2025

Precision phenotyping for curating research cohorts of patients with unexplained post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.

Alaleh Azhir, Jonas Hügel, Jiazi Tian, Jingya Cheng, Ingrid V Bassett, Douglas S Bell, Elmer V Bernstam, Maha R Farhat, Darren W Henderson, Emily S Lau and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Med (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Alaleh AzhirClinical Augmented Intelligence Group, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jonas HügelClinical Augmented Intelligence Group, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Jiazi TianClinical Augmented Intelligence Group, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jingya ChengClinical Augmented Intelligence Group, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ingrid V BassettDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Douglas S BellDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Elmer V BernstamMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Maha R FarhatDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Darren W HendersonCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Emily S LauDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Michele MorrisDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Yevgeniy R SemenovDepartment of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Virginia A TriantDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Shyam VisweswaranDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Zachary H StrasserDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeffrey G KlannDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Shawn N MurphyDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Hossein EstiriClinical Augmented Intelligence Group, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: hestiri@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

OTA-21-015A Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Initiative: NYU Langone Health Clinical Science Core, Data Resource Core, and PASC Biorepository CoreOT2HL161847 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GROSS, RACHEL SHARON, HORWITZ, LEORA · 2021 to 2025
$651.0M
UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
Convalescent Plasma to Limit Coronavirus Associated ComplicationsUL1TR003167 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KARP, DANIEL D, MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2019 to 2023
$45.3M
ENACT: Translating Health Informatics Tools to Research and Clinical Decision MakingU24TR004111 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STEVEN E REIS, SHYAM VISWESWARAN · 2022 to 2026
$23.3M
Temporal Phenotypes and Risk Models for the Post-COVID Syndrome and its sub-typesR01AI165535 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Hossein Estiri, SHAWN N MURPHY · 2022 to 2026
$4.1M
HFpEF Susceptibility in Women: The Role of InflammationK23HL159243 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Emily Lau · 2022 to 2026
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS U24 TR004111NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003167NCI NIH HHS L30 CA264747NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL159243NHLBI NIH HHS OT2 HL161847NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI165535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScalable identification of patients with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) is challenging due to a lack of reproducible precision phenotyping algorithms, which has led to suboptimal accuracy, demographic biases, and underestimation of the PASC.

methodsIn a retrospective case-control study, we developed a precision phenotyping algorithm for identifying cohorts of patients with PASC. We used longitudinal electronic health records data from over 295,000 patients from 14 hospitals and 20 community health centers in Massachusetts. The algorithm employs an attention mechanism to simultaneously exclude sequelae that prior conditions can explain and include infection-associated chronic conditions. We performed independent chart reviews to tune and validate the algorithm.

findingsThe PASC phenotyping algorithm improves precision and prevalence estimation and reduces bias in identifying PASC cohorts compared to the ICD-10-CM code U09.9. The algorithm identified a cohort of over 24,000 patients with 79.9% precision. Our estimated prevalence of PASC was 22.8%, which is close to the national estimates for the region. We also provide in-depth analyses, encompassing identified lingering effects by organ, comorbidity profiles, and temporal differences in the risk of PASC.

conclusionsPASC precision phenotyping boasts superior precision and prevalence estimation while exhibiting less bias in identifying patients with PASC. The cohort derived from this algorithm will serve as a springboard for delving into the genetic, metabolomic, and clinical intricacies of PASC, surmounting the constraints of prior PASC cohort studies.

fundingThis research was funded by the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCOVID-19AdultAgedCase-Control StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedPhenotypePost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2attention mechanismCOVID-19long Covidmachine learningPASCphenotypingpost-acute sequalaeSARS-COV-2Translation to population health

Identifiers

PMID39520983
PMCPMC11911085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.