Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39520813›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2024

Temporospatial control of topoisomerases by essential cellular processes.

Sora Kim, Monica S Guo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Prokaryotic homeostasis - a solution to thrive and survive.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sora KimDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Monica S GuoDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. Electronic address: msguo@uw.edu.

Funding

Investigating regulators of bacterial chromosome organizationR35GM154727 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Monica S. Guo · 2024 to 2026
$1.3M
Control of topoisomerase activity during DNA replication by bacterial chromosome structuring proteinsR00GM134153 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GUO, MONICA S. · 2021 to 2023
$747k
NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM134153NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM154727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topoisomerases are essential, ubiquitous enzymes that break and rejoin the DNA strand to control supercoiling. Because topoisomerases are DNA scissors, these enzymes are highly regulated to avoid excessive DNA cleavage, a vulnerability exploited by many antibiotics. Topoisomerase activity must be co-ordinated in time and space with transcription, replication, and cell division or else these processes stall, leading to genome loss. Recent work in Escherichia coli has revealed that topoisomerases do not act alone. Most topoisomerases interact with the essential process that they promote, a coupling that may stimulate topoisomerase activity precisely when and where cleavage is required. Surprisingly, in E. coli and most other bacteria, gyrase is not apparently regulated in this manner. We review how each E. coli topoisomerase is regulated, propose possible solutions to 'the gyrase problem', and conclude by highlighting how this regulation may present opportunities for antimicrobial development.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliBacteriaCell DivisionDNA GyraseDNA ReplicationDNA TopoisomerasesGene Expression Regulation, BacterialDNA GyraseDNA Topoisomerases

Identifiers

PMID39520813
PMCPMC12147940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.