ArticlePulmonary therapy2025
A Retrospective Study Evaluating Asthma Control in Patients on Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Proactive Regular Dosing with a History of Uncontrolled Asthma.
Article in Pulmonary therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe MERIT study in Malaysia is a real-world retrospective, observational, multicenter study that evaluated asthma control in patients with uncontrolled asthma who were switched from as-needed (pro re nata [PRN]) budesonide/formoterol or inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) whenever a short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) was taken, to proactive regular dosing of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL PRD).
methodsData from the medical records of patients who were stepped up to FP/SAL PRD were extracted retrospectively at baseline and follow-up (between 3 and 6 months after stepping up to FP/SAL PRD). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with improvement in asthma control assessed via the Asthma Control Test (ACT). Secondary endpoints included safety and the percentage of patients with moderate and severe exacerbations. Additionally, patient-reported use of reliever medication, systemic corticosteroids, emergency department visits, or hospitalization was also analyzed.
resultsOne hundred twenty patients with uncontrolled asthma who were stepped up to FP/SAL PRD were enrolled in the study. Of these, 76 (63.3%) patients were on prior budesonide/formoterol PRN, and 44 (36.7%) were on prior ICS with SABA PRN treatment. After stepping up to FP/SAL PRD with a mean follow-up of 5.8 months, 110 (91.7%) patients achieved asthma control at the follow-up visit (p < 0.001). Similar improvements were observed regardless of prior PRN regimen. A statistically significant improvement was observed in the mean ACT score at the follow-up visit (p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with moderate and severe exacerbations was also reduced after stepping up to FP/SAL PRD, with no adverse events reported. Over 80% of patients reported a decrease in the use of systemic corticosteroids, visits to the emergency department, or hospitalization.
conclusionThis study highlights the effectiveness of the FP/SAL PRD treatment approach in patients with uncontrolled asthma on a PRN treatment regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.