ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2025
PhenoMATRIX™ for the screening of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in pregnant women: ready to get rid of the LIM broth?
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved detection of group BMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Total laboratory automation-based monitoring processes: setup and validation of an integrated internal quality control panel.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Evolving microbiology laboratories: mastering automated culture-based processes and molecular assays, an institutional experience.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a constant need to reduce turn-around times and keep costs as low as possible for the carriage screening of GBS in pregnant patients. Laboratory automation might provide an edge in this field. The objectives of the present study were: i) to compare the performance of the direct chromID™ Strepto B agar (CA) plating against LIM-broth enriched plating on CA for the detection of GBS from vagino-rectal screening-swabs; and ii) to assess the usage of PhenoMATRIX™ for the automated screening of GBS. Between January 2021 and December 2023, 9'107 vagino-rectal specimens were collected from pregnant women at Geneva University Hospitals and were used to address the first objective. There was a small difference in the GBS detection rates between direct CA plating (13.2%; 1'202/9'107) and LIM-broth enriched plating on CA (13.2%; 1'198/9'107). Based on the LIM-broth enrichment results, the sensitivity and specificity of the direct CA plating were 98.3% (95% CI, 97.3%-98.9%) and 99.7% (95% CI, 99.5%-99.8%), respectively. Importantly, for 25 specimens, GBS growth was only detected by direct CA plating. We used a random set of 8'768 CA plate pictures for the machine learning of PhenoMATRIX™. The validation was carried out on an additional set of 830 CA plate pictures. The sensitivity and specificity of PhenoMATRIX™ were 100% (95% CI, 96.6%-100.0%) and 90.2% (95% CI, 87.8%-92.1%), respectively. We established that for GBS screening, the performance of direct CA plating is not inferior to the LIM-broth enriched approach. By relying on PhenoMATRIX™, the negative predictive value for GBS screening reaches 100% (95% CI, 99.4%-100.0%), enabling the automatic release of GBS-negative cases within 24 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.