ArticleInternational ophthalmology2024
Factors associated with pediatric silicone rod frontalis sling exposure or infection: single-institution experience of 193 eyelids.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the pre-operative, peri-operative, or post-operative risk factors that contribute to pediatric frontalis sling infection or exposure.
methodsRetrospective study of 193 eyelids that underwent silicone-rod frontalis sling surgery at a single institution between 2014 and 2019.
resultsA total of 222 eyelids were originally identified. Of the 222 eyelids that underwent frontalis sling surgery, 193 (86.9%) received silicone-rod slings (SRS), 24 (10.8%) received autologous fascia lata sling (AFS), and 5 (2.3%) received Gore-Tex slings (GS). The 193 eyelids that received SRS met inclusion criteria and underwent further statistical analysis. Patients with SRS who did not receive intra-operative antibiotics had a higher risk of infection or exposure compared to patients with SRS that did receive intraoperative antibiotics (P = 0.03). There was no association between SRS exposure and the other studied risk factors (all P-values > 0.41).
conclusionsIntraoperative antibiotics should be considered in silicone-rod frontalis suspension surgery, as it associated with a decreased risk of exposure or infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39520602What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.