ArticleClinical rheumatology2025
Prediction model for bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis based on musculoskeletal ultrasound and clinical risk factors.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vision transformer-based ordinal model for semi-quantitative synovitis grading on musculoskeletal ultrasound: a retrospective study with internal and external validation.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting the risk of bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis using a SHAP-based interpretable machine learning model.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Advances in the Application of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Review.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Development of a predictive model based on ultrasonographic features of brucella-associated periarthritis of the shoulder.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Tongue feature-based model for assessing disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Integrating Bibliometrics and Bioinformatics to Map Knowledge Structure and Trend Synthesis in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Bone Erosion (2015-2024).Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Machine learning differentiation of rheumatoid arthritis-Sjögren's syndrome overlap from Sjögren's syndrome with polyarthritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Reply to "Letter to the Editor": Prognostic analysis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with systemic vasculitides: a retrospective cohort study.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeProgressive bone erosion (BE) is a prominent manifestation of structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed to construct and validate a BE prediction model (BEPM) for RA based on musculoskeletal ultrasound and clinical risk factors.
methodsA total of 312 RA patients without BE were consecutively collected and followed up for 2 years, who were divided into BE group and non-bone erosion group, as confirmed by two radiology experts based on at least two imaging techniques. Relevant clinical information, such as anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (ACCP) antibody and disease duration, was collected. Musculoskeletal ultrasound examinations were performed on all patients upon admission. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for BE and to establish the prediction model. The calibration, diagnostic efficacy, and clinical effectiveness of BEPM were evaluated by calibration curve plots, receiver-operating characteristic curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsBinary logistic regression analysis screened four variables, including synovial hyperplasia, synovial blood flow, ACCP + , and disease duration, into the prediction model. BEPM exhibited good diagnostic performance in both the training and validation groups, with area under the curve values of 0.949 (95% CI 0.924-0.973) and 0.965 (95% CI 0.935-0.996), respectively. Using 0.376 as the optical cutoff value for BE, the sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index of the model in the training group were 86.0%, 90.4%, and 76.4%, respectively. In the DCA curves, BEPM indicated overall good population benefit.
conclusionBEPM demonstrates high diagnostic performance and clinical utility, and may be a useful clinical model for predicting BE in patients with RA. Key Points • Synovial hyperplasia, synovial blood flow, ACCP+ , and disease duration are independent risk factors for bone erosion in RA patients. • BEPM exhibits good diagnostic performance in both the training and validation groups. • Combining musculoskeletal ultrasound parameters with key clinical risk factors to construct a bone erosion model is feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39520586What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.