Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39520551›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

Continuous intraocular pressure variations following positional transitions in normal subjects and open angle glaucoma patients using a contact lens sensor system.

Yuning Zhang, Wenxin Yang, Zidong Chen, Xinyi Zhang, Ping Wai Or, Ching Hymn Christopher Lee, Isuru Kaweendra Karunaratne, Yunzhi Xu, Pingping Liu, Iok Tong Chong and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yuning ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Wenxin YangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Zidong ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Xinyi ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Ping Wai OrDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Ching Hymn Christopher LeeDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Isuru Kaweendra KarunaratneDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Yunzhi XuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Pingping LiuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Iok Tong ChongDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Zhen QinDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
David C C LamDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong. medcclam@ust.hk.
Minbin YuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. yuminbin@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3938-7164

Funding

Advanced Research Program of China's Manned Spaceflight 020105The Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Fund MRP/039/18X
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy of a novel contact lens sensor system (CLS) in detecting continuous intraocular pressure (IOP) variations following positional transitions, and to explore these IOP variation patterns among normal subjects, untreated glaucoma patients, and untreated ocular hypertension (OHT) subjects.

methodsThis prospective comparative study included 20 normal subjects, 14 high tension glaucoma (HTG) patients, 16 normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients, and 14 OHT subjects. Participants wore the CLS for continuous IOP monitoring while undergoing sequential body position changes: from sitting to supine to a 10° head-down tilt (HDT), with each position maintained for ten minutes. Continuous IOP parameters, including mean, peak, and fluctuation (peak minus valley) in each position, as well as increment (peak minus starting value), interval (time to arrive peak), and velocity (increment divided by interval) after two position transitions, were compared among different positions and groups, respectively.

resultsNormal subjects, HTG and NTG patients exhibited higher CLS IOP mean and peak in supine/HDT positions compared to sitting (P < 0.05), but the mean or peak in HDT did not significantly differ from that in supine (P > 0.2). In OHT, all IOP parameters showed no significant difference among various positions (P > 0.1), except for velocity. Comparisons among groups revealed that during the transition from sitting to supine, HTG demonstrated higher IOP increment than other three groups and higher velocity than normal subjects (P < 0.05). NTG patients exhibited no significant differences in IOP increment, interval and velocity, compared to normal subjects (P > 0.05).

conclusionsThe CLS proved effective in continuously recording IOP responses following positional changes in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Transitioning from sitting to supine resulted in increased IOP among normal subjects, HTG and NTG patients, but not in OHT. Compared to normal subjects, this IOP increase was more pronounced and rapid in HTG, but comparable in NTG. KEY MESSAGES: WHAT IS KNOWN : Positional transitions can induce IOP variations, which differ among normal subjects and glaucoma patients, and potentially relate to glaucomatous neuropathy. However, prior findings are constrained by the discontinuity of traditional tonometry. WHAT IS NEW: This study utilized a novel contact lens sensor system (CLS) to continuously monitor IOP during positional transitions in normal subjects and untreated glaucoma/OHT subjects. Continuous IOP outcomes revealed that normal subjects, HTG patients, and NTG patients exhibited an increase in IOP when transitioning from sitting to supine, whereas OHT did not. Compared to normal subjects, this increase in IOP was more pronounced and rapid in HTG patients, but similar in NTG.

Indexed as

Contact LensesGlaucoma, Open-AngleIntraocular PressurePostureTonometry, OcularAdultAgedEquipment DesignFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesBody positionContact lensGlaucomaIntraocular pressure

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.