ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025
Continuous intraocular pressure variations following positional transitions in normal subjects and open angle glaucoma patients using a contact lens sensor system.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current and Emerging Technologies for Continuous Intraocular Pressure Monitoring in the Control of Glaucoma Progression: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Glaucoma After Dark: Sleep, Circadian Stress, and Unmeasured Drivers of Disease.Journal of current glaucoma practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the efficacy of a novel contact lens sensor system (CLS) in detecting continuous intraocular pressure (IOP) variations following positional transitions, and to explore these IOP variation patterns among normal subjects, untreated glaucoma patients, and untreated ocular hypertension (OHT) subjects.
methodsThis prospective comparative study included 20 normal subjects, 14 high tension glaucoma (HTG) patients, 16 normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients, and 14 OHT subjects. Participants wore the CLS for continuous IOP monitoring while undergoing sequential body position changes: from sitting to supine to a 10° head-down tilt (HDT), with each position maintained for ten minutes. Continuous IOP parameters, including mean, peak, and fluctuation (peak minus valley) in each position, as well as increment (peak minus starting value), interval (time to arrive peak), and velocity (increment divided by interval) after two position transitions, were compared among different positions and groups, respectively.
resultsNormal subjects, HTG and NTG patients exhibited higher CLS IOP mean and peak in supine/HDT positions compared to sitting (P < 0.05), but the mean or peak in HDT did not significantly differ from that in supine (P > 0.2). In OHT, all IOP parameters showed no significant difference among various positions (P > 0.1), except for velocity. Comparisons among groups revealed that during the transition from sitting to supine, HTG demonstrated higher IOP increment than other three groups and higher velocity than normal subjects (P < 0.05). NTG patients exhibited no significant differences in IOP increment, interval and velocity, compared to normal subjects (P > 0.05).
conclusionsThe CLS proved effective in continuously recording IOP responses following positional changes in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Transitioning from sitting to supine resulted in increased IOP among normal subjects, HTG and NTG patients, but not in OHT. Compared to normal subjects, this IOP increase was more pronounced and rapid in HTG, but comparable in NTG. KEY MESSAGES: WHAT IS KNOWN : Positional transitions can induce IOP variations, which differ among normal subjects and glaucoma patients, and potentially relate to glaucomatous neuropathy. However, prior findings are constrained by the discontinuity of traditional tonometry. WHAT IS NEW: This study utilized a novel contact lens sensor system (CLS) to continuously monitor IOP during positional transitions in normal subjects and untreated glaucoma/OHT subjects. Continuous IOP outcomes revealed that normal subjects, HTG patients, and NTG patients exhibited an increase in IOP when transitioning from sitting to supine, whereas OHT did not. Compared to normal subjects, this increase in IOP was more pronounced and rapid in HTG patients, but similar in NTG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39520551What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.