Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025
Proton beam irradiation with anti-VEGF therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: results of a 24-month, phase II randomized study.
Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine the efficacy and safety of proton beam irradiation (PBI) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV)/ aneurysmal type 1 macular neovascularization (AT1).
methodsThe randomized clinical trial consisted of newly diagnosed active PCV/AT1 patients who were randomized 1:1 to treatment with three initial monthly intravitreal anti-VEGF agent (conbercept) injections with or without single 14 GyE radiation. Subsequent anti-VEGF therapy was given pro re nata. The primary outcome measures were number of anti-VEGF injections, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central retinal thickness (CRT) at 24 months. Secondary outcome measures included the polypoidal lesion regression rate, changes in the areas of polypoidal lesions and branching vascular network (BVN), and radiotherapy-related adverse events at 24 months.
resultsA total of 45 eyes (86.5%) completed the 24-month follow-up. At 24 months, the combination therapy group required fewer anti-VEGF injections compared with the monotherapy group (5.9 ± 4.1 vs. 8.8 ± 5.3; P = 0.04). The mean gains in BCVA and the mean decrease in CRT were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.85 and P = 0.17, respectively). Combination therapy was superior to monotherapy for complete polypoidal lesion regression (80.0% vs. 48%, P = 0.03) and change in BVN area (- 1.03 ± 1.24 mm
conclusionPBI (14 GyE) combined with anti-VEGF therapy could decrease the need for additional anti-VEGF injections for PCV/AT1. Longer follow-up is needed to fully evaluate the long-term safety of PBI. KEY MESSAGES: What is known The current main methods for treating PCV/AT1 include anti-VEGF drugs as monotherapy or in combination with photodynamic therapy. However, some cases can be challenging with multiple repeated injections due to the relatively low regression rate of polyps and high recurrence rate. What is new Proton beam irradiation therapy with anti-VEGF drugs can synergistically promote the regression of polyps and the shrinkage of branching vascular network, and reduce the anti-VEGF treatment burden for patients with PCV/AT1. Radiation retinopathy was mild and did not appear to be visually significant at the 24-month follow-up. Proton beam irradiation can be a new strategy for the treatment of PCV/AT1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39520549What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.