Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39520548›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

Subclinical corneal inflammation and subbasal nerve alterations in keratoconus detected by in vivo confocal microscopy: a cross-sectional study.

Chareenun Chirapapaisan, Methawee Sawarot, Sathiya Kengpunpanich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Update on the Physiopathology of Keratoconus.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Stage-dependent alterations in corneal epithelium, stromal keratocyte density, and subbasal nerve plexus in keratoconus: an in vivo confocal microscopy study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. PeerJ · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chareenun ChirapapaisanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Siriraj, 10700, Bangkok, Thailand.
Methawee SawarotDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Siriraj, 10700, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sathiya KengpunpanichDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Siriraj, 10700, Bangkok, Thailand. sathiya.ken99@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9751-0845

Funding

Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University R016133008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the intracorneal inflammation and subbasal nerve alterations in keratoconus.

methodsThis prospective cross-sectional study recruited patients with keratoconus, who were diagnosed and graded the severity based on clinical examination and Schiempflug tomography. Laser in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) was performed on the corneal subbasal layer centrally to explore the inflammatory cells (ICs), subbasal nerve density (SND), and nerve tortuosity. Keratoconus severity and related factors including ocular allergy, systemic atopy, eye rubbing, floppy eyelids, and contact lens use were recorded. Association between the factors, IC density, SND and keratoconus severity were analyzed.

resultsThirty-four keratoconus eyes were enrolled, and their IVCM findings were compared with those of 20 age-matched normal eyes. Keratoconus showed a significant increase in ICs (44.25 ± 7.01 vs. 13.06 ± 7.51 cells/mm

conclusionKeratoconus, a clinically noninflammatory corneal disease, demonstrates subclinical corneal inflammation and subbasal nerve decline as shown by IVCM. These alterations correlate considerably with the severity of keratoconus. KEY MESSAGES: What is known Traditionally, Keratoconus is a clinically noninflammatory corneal disease. What is new Our study suspected keratoconus may be subclinical corneal inflammatory disease. In our research, A Keratoconus patient was discovered to have corneal inflammation and a reduction in sub-basal nerve density through the use of In Vivo Confocal Microscopy. Increase in corneal inflammation is considerably correlated with the severity of keratoconus.

Indexed as

CorneaKeratoconusNerve FibersOphthalmic NerveAdultCorneal TopographyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung AdultIn vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM)KeratoconusSubbasal nervesSubclinical corneal inflammation

Identifiers

PMID39520548
PMCPMC11953167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.