Trial reportDysphagia2025
Oral Transport, Penetration, and Aspiration in PD: Insights from a RCT on STN + SNr Stimulation.
Trial report in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disease Duration Differentiates Freezing of Gait Response to Subthalamic and Nigral Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease in an Exploratory Multicenter Controlled Trial.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2026Article
- Effect of deep brain stimulation on dysphagia in Parkinson's disease: mechanisms, evidence, and outlook.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dysphagia is frequent and detrimental in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) and does not respond to standard treatments. Experimental models suggested that pathological overactivity of the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) may hinder oral contributions to swallowing. Here, we hypothesized that the combined stimulation of subthalamic nucleus (STN) and SNr improves measures of dysphagia after eight weeks of active treatment. We enrolled 20 PD patients with dysphagia and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Patients were assessed in 'medication on' and 'STN' stimulation at baseline (V1) and then were randomized 1:1 to 'STN' or 'STN + SNr' stimulation. In addition, patients of both groups received swallowing therapy as a standard of care. The primary endpoint was the change in Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) at eight-week follow-up (V2) with respect to the baseline (V1) under the hypothesis, that 'STN + SNr' was superior to 'STN'. We obtained further secondary endpoints on oral preparation, transport, pharyngeal phase, penetration, and aspiration. PAS change from V1 to V2 was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.221). When considering all patients for secondary analyses, we found that the entire study cohort showed better PAS scores at V2 compared to V1 irrespective from DBS treatment allocation (p = 0.0156). Both STN and STN + SNr treatments were safe. 'STN + SNr' stimulation was not superior compared to standard 'STN' stimulation both on PAS and the secondary endpoints. We found that the entire study cohort improved dysphagia after eight weeks, which presumably mirrors the effect of continued swallowing therapy and the increased patient attention on swallowing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39520524What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.