ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2025
Cardiovascular Health Metrics of Spouses of Indian Women with a History of Gestational Diabetes and Diabetes in Pregnancy: Results from CHIP-F Study.
Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gestational diabetes and spousal health: the Finnish gestational diabetes study.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Prevalence and concordance of cardiometabolic risk markers and health behaviour among couples after a gestational diabetes mellitus-affected pregnancy.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThere are limited data on the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors/diseases (diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) and their composite scores reflecting overall cardiovascular health among young (< 50 years old) married couples.
methodsWe have an established longitudinal prospective cohort of postpartum women with a history of hyperglycemia [pre-existing diabetes (PED; n = 101), overt diabetes in pregnancy (ODiP; n = 92), gestational diabetes (GDM; n = 643)], and normoglycemia (n = 183) in pregnancy and their spouses (n = 819). In this study, we report data from baseline cross-sectional evaluation of these 819 young couples regarding the burden of cardiovascular risk factors/diseases, their concordance and associations.
resultsThe mean (SD) age was 33.5 (4.9) years for women and 36.9 (5.4) years for men, and the evaluation was performed at a median (IQR) postpartum interval of 30 (20-45) months. Diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and dyslipidemia were present in 25.0%, 6.9%, 25.6%, and 4.0% of women and 15.8%, 20.2%, 14.3%, and 8.2% of men, respectively. Among men, dysglycemia (diabetes/prediabetes) and adverse cardiovascular score (average/poor) showed a significant trend in progression according to the antenatal categories of their partner (highest in DIP, intermediate in GDM, and lowest in normoglycemia). The concordance was higher for adverse cardiovascular score (58.5%), overweight/obesity (48.7%), and dysglycemia (42.4%) compared to prehypertension/hypertension (29.2%) and hypercholesterolemia (8.2%). The odds ratios were significant for all associations evaluated, except for elevated blood pressure, being strongest (OR > 2.0) for overweight/obesity and adverse cardiovascular score.
conclusionsNearly three in five young couples evaluated in the study showed concordance for adverse cardiovascular scores. The cardiovascular risk in men increased in a graded manner across the increasing severity of antenatal glycemic categories of their partners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.