Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39520276›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroendocrinology2025

Assessment of response to PRRT including anatomical and molecular imaging as well as novel biomarkers.

Grace Kong, Geertje Noe, Cherie Chiang, Ken Herrmann, Thomas A Hope, Michael Michael

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroendocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Grace KongDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0834-6888
Geertje NoeDepartment of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cherie ChiangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ken HerrmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thomas A HopeDepartment of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Michael MichaelSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective treatment for both oncological and hormone control and is a widely accepted standard of care treatment for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). Its use is anticipated to increase significantly, and this demands accurate tools and paradigms to assess treatment response post PRRT. This article outlines the current role and future developments of anatomical, molecular imaging and biomarkers for response assessment to PRRT, highlighting the challenges and provides perspectives for the need to focus on a multimodality, multidisciplinary and individualised approach for patients with this complex heterogeneous disease.

Indexed as

Molecular ImagingNeuroendocrine TumorsRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, PeptideBiomarkersHumansBiomarkersRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, Peptidebiomarkersmolecular imagingPRRTradiologyresponse

Identifiers

PMID39520276
PMCPMC11919480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.