ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2024
An Analysis of the Diversity of Skin Colour Representation in Paediatric Nursing Practitioner Textbooks.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsOur study aims to analyse 8 commonly used textbooks to determine how diverse skin tones are represented in paediatric nursing practitioner education.
designLiterature reviewed from 2016 to 2024 demonstrated that the lack of darkly pigmented skin colour representation in health science education leads to diminished patient outcomes for these populations. Our study sought to study representation teaching images and eight commonly referenced nursing textbooks were chosen for this study, given their use in paediatric nurse practitioner education. Of the eight textbooks selected, five were analysed based on inclusion criteria.
methodsTwo investigators trained in skin prototyping coded each textbook for skin colour representation and coded during 2023-2024. Coders used the widely accepted prototyping scale, the Fitzpatrick Scale (range I-VI, with I being the lightest colour skin and VI the darkest). Teaching photographs were defined as all photos used to provide insight into a disease or diagnostic technique that included human skin. Two individual coders coded and documented data, ensuring each coder was blinded to the overall results.
resultsOur analysis of 5 textbooks revealed that 2112 images met the criteria as teaching images. Of the 2112 teaching images, 593.5 included images of type IV-VI skin (darkly pigmented skin), resulting in a 28% representation of dark skin tone images. Additionally, 2 of the 82 total illustrations included patients with dark skin tones, indicating a representation of 2.5%. However, chapters addressing conditions of child abuse/neglect (55.95%) and stigmatised social issues (infectious disease, 54.88%) displayed a disproportionate representation of patients from these demographics.
conclusionsOur results highlight the importance of enhancing equitable representation in educational resources for nursing practitioners. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION/ PATIENT CARE: There is room to collaborate with other health science institutions to establish clear guidelines for future improvement in expanding teaching images to include diversity representation in education. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.