ArticleTechnology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine2024
The effectiveness of deep learning model in differentiating benign and malignant pulmonary nodules on spiral CT.
Article in Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advantages of integrating artificial intelligence and spectral CT for lung nodule classification and prognostic judgment: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- New Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening and Artificial Intelligence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Intervertebral disc anomaly intelligent classification system based on deep learning, IDAICS.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of combined CT artificial intelligence (AI) system and lung cancer biomarkers in pulmonary nodule evaluation.AIMS public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary nodule, one of the most common clinical phenomena, is an irregular circular lesion with a diameter of ⩽ 3 cm in the lungs, which can be classified as benign or malignant. Differentiating benign and malignant pulmonary nodules has an essential effect on clinical medical diagnosis.
objectiveTo explore the clinical value and diagnostic effects of the lung nodule classification and segmentation algorithm based on deep learning in differentiating benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.
methodsA deep learning model with a fine-grained classification manner for the discrimination of pulmonary models in Dr.Wise Lung Analyzer. This study retrospectively enrolled 120 patients with pulmonary nodules detected by chest spiral CT from March 2021 to September 2022 in the radiology department of Ninghai First Hospital. The DL-based method and physicians' accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity results were compared using the pathological results as the gold standard. The ROC curve of the deep learning model was plotted, and the AUCs were calculated.
resultsOn 120 CT images, pathologically diagnosed 81 malignant nodules and 122 benign modules. The AUCs of radiologists' diagnostic approach and DL-base method for differentiating patients were 0.62 and 0.81; radiologists' diagnostic approach and DL-base method achieved AUCs of 0.75 and 0.90 for benign and malignant pulmonary nodules differentiate. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with the deep learning model were 73.33%, 78.75%, and 62.50%, respectively, while the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with the physician's diagnosis were 63.33%, 66.25%, and 57.500.
conclusionThere was no significant difference between the diagnosis results of the proposed DL-based method and the radiologists' diagnostic approach in differentiating benign and malignant lung nodules on spiral CT (P< 0.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.