ArticleMilitary medicine2025
Profiles of Nonpharmacologic Treatment Receipt in the First 10 Weeks Following a New Back Pain Diagnosis Among Active Duty Soldiers: A Latent Class Analysis.
Article in Military medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionUS service members experience high rates of back pain. Guidelines prioritize nonpharmacologic treatment (NPT) as first-line pain treatments; however, NPT utilization patterns research is limited. This study examined NPT patterns of care within the first 10 weeks following an index back pain diagnosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsData were from the Substance Use and Psychological Injury Combat Study and included 222,427 active duty soldiers with an index back pain diagnosis following return from Afghanistan/Iraq deployment in 2008-2014. We fit a series of latent class analysis models to identify homogenous subgroups of soldiers with NPT utilization during the 10-week period and measured associations with soldier characteristics and clinical characteristics within 90 days before the back pain diagnosis, with the distinct NPT utilization classes. Approval for this study was granted by the Brandeis University Committee for Protection of Human Subjects (Institutional Review Board #14153) and the Uniformed Services University Institutional Review Board.
resultsOnly half of the soldiers received any NPT within their 10-week early treatment window. Latent class analysis identified 4 classes over the 10-week early treatment window: Class 1 (None/Low NPT, 65%); Class 2 (High and Decreasing NPT, 15%); Class 3 (Low and Increasing NPT, 13%), and Class 4 (Sustained NPT, 7%). Soldier clinical characteristics from the 90-day preperiod window were most important in distinguishing class membership in relation to Class 1, particularly comorbid pain conditions, diagnosis of traumatic brain injury, receipt of prescription opioids, and receipt of invasive surgery.
conclusionsPatterns of weekly NPT utilization during an early treatment window following a new back pain diagnosis varied temporally, with approximately half of soldiers using NPT. Half of the soldiers did not receive any NPT within their 10-week early treatment window, which highlights opportunities for increasing use of NPT utilization among military members with a new back pain episode. Future research is needed in the Military Health System to examine the extent to which NPT patterns are associated with pain management outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.