Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025
Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationships of dostarlimab in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in part 1 of RUBY.
Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Cohort Expansion Study of TSR-042, an Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Study of Dostarlimab (TSR-042) Plus Carboplatin-paclitaxel Versus Placebo Plus Carboplatin-paclitaxel in Patients With Recurrent or Primary Advanced Endometrial Cancer (RUBY)
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exposure-Response Relationship of Dostarlimab in Primary Advanced/Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: Results From Interim Analysis 2 of Part 1 of the RUBY Trial.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2026Trial
- Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationships of dostarlimab in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in part 1 of RUBY.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsDostarlimab-gxly is a humanized monoclonal antibody of the IgG4 isotype that binds to the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) receptor and blocks its ligands. RUBY (NCT03981796) is a two-part multicentre study in patients with recurrent or primary advanced endometrial cancer. The overall aims were to characterise the population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) from Part 1 of this study, identify relevant covariates of interest, and assess exposure-efficacy/safety (ER) relationships.
methodsA PopPK model developed using GARNET (NCT02715284) study data for dostarlimab monotherapy was externally validated with RUBY Part 1 study data. Subsequently, the model was updated with data across the two studies. Exposure-safety analyses for adverse events related to dostarlimab alone or in combination with standard of care (SOC) were modelled using logistic regression. Exposure-efficacy analysis included Cox proportional hazards analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS).
resultsFor the model update, 7957 pharmacokinetics observations from 868 patients pooled from both RUBY and GARNET studies were available. The model was consistent with the previous model. Dostarlimab clearance was estimated to be 7.79% lower when dostarlimab was given as SOC combination therapy. However, no significant covariates were clinically relevant. Hepatic or renal impairment did not affect pharmacokinetics. Among the safety endpoints, only rash showed a small yet statistically significant effect (P < .05) in all subjects; however, this was not not deemed clinically relevant. There were no other clinically significant exposure-safety or exposure-PFS relationships.
conclusionsThe addition of chemotherapy to dostarlimab had limited effect on dostarlimab PopPK, with no clinically significant covariates or clinically relevant exposure-safety or exposure-PFS relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.