Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39519905›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Comparative Study on the Response of Hyssop (

Liubov Skrypnik, Pavel Maslennikov, Maria Antipina, Dmitriy Katserov, Pavel Feduraev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liubov SkrypnikLaboratory of Natural Antioxidants, Research and Education Center "Industrial Biotechnologies", Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 236040 Kaliningrad, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6280-1194
Pavel MaslennikovScientific and Educational Cluster MEDBIO, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 236040 Kaliningrad, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6177-4542
Maria AntipinaScientific and Educational Cluster MEDBIO, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 236040 Kaliningrad, Russia.
Dmitriy KatserovScientific and Educational Cluster MEDBIO, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 236040 Kaliningrad, Russia.
Pavel FeduraevScientific and Educational Cluster MEDBIO, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 236040 Kaliningrad, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7577-6132

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 22-14-00106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought is one of the most important abiotic factors limiting plant productivity. Although the aromatic plants of the Lamiaceae family often grow in arid regions, drought tolerance varies greatly among the different species of this family. The effect of induced drought stress can be reduced by the application of selenium. The current study aims to compare the growth and biochemical responses of three species of the Lamiaceae family (hyssop, salvia, and oregano) to drought stress and the possibility of reducing the effect of stress in these plants by foliar treatment with selenium. Drought stress reduced the fresh and dry biomass of hyssop (by 35% and 15%), salvia (by 45% and 41%), and oregano (by 51% and 32%). Se treatment did not affect the growth of plants under drought stress, but it improved relative water content in hyssop and salvia under moderate drought conditions. A reduction in the content of chlorophyll

Indexed as

abiotic stressaromatic plantsascorbate–glutathione cycleirrigationosmolytephotosynthesisreactive oxygen specieswater-deficit stress

Identifiers

PMID39519905
PMCPMC11547996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.