ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
An Accurate and Efficient Approach to Knowledge Extraction from Scientific Publications Using Structured Ontology Models, Graph Neural Networks, and Large Language Models.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Survey on Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Biomedicine and Healthcare.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid growth of biomedical literature makes it challenging for researchers to stay current. Integrating knowledge from various sources is crucial for studying complex biological systems. Traditional text-mining methods often have limited accuracy because they don't capture semantic and contextual nuances. Deep-learning models can be computationally expensive and typically have low interpretability, though efforts in explainable AI aim to mitigate this. Furthermore, transformer-based models have a tendency to produce false or made-up information-a problem known as hallucination-which is especially prevalent in large language models (LLMs). This study proposes a hybrid approach combining text-mining techniques with graph neural networks (GNNs) and fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) to extend biomedical knowledge graphs and interpret predicted edges based on published literature. An LLM is used to validate predictions and provide explanations. Evaluated on a corpus of experimentally confirmed protein interactions, the approach achieved a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.772. Applied to insomnia, the approach identified 25 interactions between 32 human proteins absent in known knowledge bases, including regulatory interactions between MAOA and 5-HT2C, binding between ADAM22 and 14-3-3 proteins, which is implicated in neurological diseases, and a circadian regulatory loop involving RORB and NR1D1. The hybrid GNN-LLM method analyzes biomedical literature efficiency to uncover potential molecular interactions for complex disorders. It can accelerate therapeutic target discovery by focusing expert verification on the most relevant automatically extracted information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.