Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39519268›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Copy Number Variation and Selection Signal: Exploring the Domestication History and Phenotype Differences Between Duroc and the Chinese Native Ningxiang Pigs.

Fang Yang, Wenwu Chen, Yanda Yang, Yang Meng, Yantong Chen, Xiaoling Ding, Yuebo Zhang, Jun He, Ning Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fang YangKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China.
Wenwu ChenKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China.
Yanda YangKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China.
Yang MengKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China.
Yantong ChenKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China.
Xiaoling DingCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Yuebo ZhangKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China.
Jun HeKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China.
Ning GaoKey Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources (Pig) Evaluation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9216-2725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Ningxiang pig, one of the well-known Chinese native pig breeds, has the advantages of tender meat, high intramuscular fat (IMF) content, and roughage tolerance, compared to the commercial lean pig breeds. The genetic basis for complex traits in Ningxiang pigs has been previously studied through other genetic markers, such as Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP), while the characteristics of copy number variation (CNV) and the selection signal have not been investigated yet. In this study, GGP 50 k genotyping data of 2242 Ningxiang pigs (NX) and 1137 Duroc pigs (Duroc) were involved in CNV atlas construction and selection signals identification. Annotations of genes and quantitative trait locus (QTLs) were performed on the target candidate regions, as follows: (1) 162 CNVs were detected in Ningxiang pigs, while 326 CNVs were detected in Duroc pigs, and there are 21 copy number variation regions (CNVRs) shared between them; (2) The CNVRs of Duroc are more abundant, with 192 CNVRs, accounting for 1.61% of the entire genome, while those of Ningxiang pigs only have 98 CNVRs, accounting for 0.49%; (3) The QTLs annotated on CNVs and selected regions of Ningxiang pigs were mainly associated with meat quality and fertility. In contrast, the Duroc QTLs' notes relate primarily to the carcass and immunity, and explain why they have a higher slaughter rate and immunity; (4) There is a presence of high-frequency acquired CNVs, specifically in Ningxiang pigs, with 24 genes significantly enriched in the sensory receptor-related pathway in this region; (5) Based on the CNVs atlas, candidate genes such as 3 inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor, type 3 (

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsDomesticationPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsBreedingChinaGenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticSus scrofaSwineCNVsNingxiang pigsphenotypic variationQTLselective signals

Identifiers

PMID39519268
PMCPMC11546390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.