ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Post Mortem Molecular Biomarkers of Asphyxia: A Literature Review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Managing: new molecular markers to differentiate carbon dioxide intoxication from asphyxia due to oxygen deficiency.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- New molecular markers to differentiate carbon dioxide intoxication from asphyxia due to oxygen deficiency.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asphyxia is a critical condition characterized by inadequate oxygen supply to the body. Post mortem diagnostics of asphyxia present significant challenges in forensic pathology, particularly when there are equivocal signs during autopsy or uncertain circumstantial data. The identification of biochemical biomarkers that indicate asphyxia has emerged as a promising area of research, as these markers can provide vital insights into the physiological changes occurring at the cellular level during asphyxiation. We performed a review of the scientific literature on the search engines Pubmed and Scopus in order to assess the state of the art on this topic. The aim of this study is to analyze which are the most promising markers and methods in the post mortem diagnosis of asphyxia. The literature review highlighted the great potential that molecular investigations can have in the analysis of this type of death, especially considering that hypoxia determines strong biochemical alterations in response to cellular stress. These changes are marked by specific biochemical alterations, which can be detected through various advanced technologies and methodologies, including mass spectrometry, immunohistochemistry, and metabolomic profiling. The review evidenced a combination of markers that can be used for diagnostic purposes in various cases, including mechanical asphyxia, carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning, perinatal asphyxia, and drowning analysis. However, we highlight that, to date, there are still no standard protocols for forensic biochemistry in asphyxia. By scrutinizing the reliability of identified biomarkers and their potential to reshape forensic investigative practices, this research aims to elucidate the critical role that post mortem biochemical analysis can play in diagnosing asphyxia, ultimately contributing to a more nuanced understanding of death-related scenarios and the development of standardized protocols in forensic examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.