Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39519131›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

An Update on Molecular Mechanisms of Scarring-A Narrative Review.

Michael Kohlhauser, Marcel Mayrhofer, Lars-Peter Kamolz, Christian Smolle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Fractional COSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Porcelain gallbladder revisited.Journal of ultrasound · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Macroscopic Markers of Dolphin Healing at Sea Linked to Immunity.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael KohlhauserDivision of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2884-231X
Marcel MayrhoferDivision of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Lars-Peter KamolzDivision of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5975-876X
Christian SmolleDivision of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8060-2826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fibroblasts, the principal cellular mediators of connective tissue remodeling, play a crucial role in the formation of physiological and pathological scars. Understanding the intricate interplay between fibroblasts and other cellular and molecular components is essential for elucidating the underlying mechanisms driving scar formation. Hypertrophic scars, keloids and atrophic scars arise from dysregulated wound healing processes characterized by persistent inflammation, aberrant collagen deposition, and impaired extracellular matrix remodeling. Fibroblasts play a central role in the pathogenesis of such pathological scars, driving aberrant extracellular matrix remodeling, subsequently contributing to the formation of raised or depressed fibrotic lesions. The investigation of complex interactions between fibroblasts and the microenvironment is crucial for developing targeted therapeutic interventions aimed at modulating fibroblast activity and improving clinical outcomes in patients with pathological scars. Further research into the molecular pathways governing fibroblast behavior and their heterogeneity holds promise for advancing scar management strategies. This narrative review was performed to shed light on the mechanisms behind scar formation, with a special focus on the role of fibroblasts in the formation of different types of scars, providing insights into the pathophysiology of these conditions. Through the analysis of current knowledge, this review seeks to identify the key cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in fibroblast activation, collagen synthesis, and extracellular matrix remodeling in hypertrophic scar, keloid, or atrophic scar formation.

Indexed as

CicatrixExtracellular MatrixFibroblastsAnimalsCicatrix, HypertrophicCollagenHumansKeloidWound HealingCollagenatrophic scarsfibroblast heterogeneityfibroblastsfibrosishealing processhypertrophic scarskeloidscarringscarswound healing

Identifiers

PMID39519131
PMCPMC11546163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.