Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39519117›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Antibacterial Properties of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles (Review).

Sergey V Gudkov, Dmitry E Burmistrov, Polina A Fomina, Shamil Z Validov, Valery A Kozlov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biochemical Modulation of FeChemistry & biodiversity · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review of Antimicrobial Properties of Carbon Nanomaterials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Composite Based onPolymers · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Green Synthesis of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles UsingNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sergey V GudkovProkhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilove St. 38, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8814-6906
Dmitry E BurmistrovProkhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilove St. 38, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8979-3833
Polina A FominaProkhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilove St. 38, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Shamil Z ValidovFederal Research Center Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Lobachevskogo 2/31, Tatarstan, 420088 Kazan, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9441-409X
Valery A KozlovProkhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilove St. 38, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3291-4395

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-15-2024-646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles is frequently regarded as a potential solution to the issue of bacterial antibiotic resistance. Among the proposed range of nanoparticles with antibacterial properties, copper oxide nanoparticles are of particular interest. Although the antibacterial properties of copper have been known for a considerable period of time, studies on the effects of copper oxide nanomaterials with respect to biological systems have attracted considerable attention in recent years. This review presents a summary of the antibacterial properties of copper oxide nanoparticles, the mechanisms by which the antibacterial effect is realized, and the key reported methods of modifying these nanoparticles to improve their antibacterial activity. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of these nanoparticles is presented depending on the type of microorganism, the shape of the nanoparticles, and the Gram classification of bacteria based on data from published sources. In addition, the review addresses the biological activities of copper oxide nanoparticles, including their antifungal and cytotoxic properties, as well as their "antioxidant" activity. According to the conducted analysis of the literature data, it can be concluded that copper oxide nanoparticles have a significant bacteriostatic potential with respect to a wide range of microorganisms and, in some cases, contribute to the inhibition of fungal growth. At the same time, the sensitivity of Gram-positive bacteria to the effect of copper oxide nanoparticles was often higher than that of Gram-negative bacteria.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCopperMetal NanoparticlesAntioxidantsBacteriaGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntioxidantsCoppercuprous oxideantimicrobial agentcopper oxidecopper oxide nanoparticlesCuOgreen synthesis

Identifiers

PMID39519117
PMCPMC11547097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.