ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
A Comparison of Molecular Techniques for Improving the Methodology in the Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- BioFRAM PGx, an Implementation Proposal for Pharmacogenetics in the Spanish National Health System.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenetics and laboratory medicine: from individual genes towards integral genetic testing.Advances in laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the most critical goals in healthcare is safe and effective drug therapy, which is directly related to an individual's response to treatment. Precision medicine can improve drug safety in many scenarios, including polypharmacy, and it requires the development of new genetic characterization methods. In this report, we use real-time PCR, microarray techniques, and mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF), which allows us to compare them and identify the potential benefits of technological improvements, leading to better quality medical care. These comparative studies, as part of our pharmacogenetic Five-Step Precision Medicine (5SPM) approach, reveal the superiority of mass spectrometry over the other methods analyzed and highlight the importance of updating the laboratory's pharmacogenetic methodology to identify new variants with clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.