Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39518990›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Evaluating Bioinformatics Processing of Somatic Variant Detection in cfDNA Using Targeted Sequencing with UMIs.

Yixin Lin, Mads Heilskov Rasmussen, Mikkel Hovden Christensen, Amanda Frydendahl, Lasse Maretty, Claus Lindbjerg Andersen, Søren Besenbacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yixin LinDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Mads Heilskov RasmussenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5723-6303
Mikkel Hovden ChristensenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Amanda FrydendahlDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9552-5421
Lasse MarettyDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.
Claus Lindbjerg AndersenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7406-2103
Søren BesenbacherDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1455-1738

Funding

Danish Cancer Society R257-A14700Novo Nordisk Foundation NNF22OC0074415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising cancer biomarker, but accurately detecting tumor mutations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is challenging due to their low frequency and sequencing errors. Our study benchmarked Mutect2, VarScan2, shearwater, and DREAMS-vc using deep targeted sequencing of cfDNA with Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) from 111 colorectal cancer patients. Performance was assessed at both the mutation level (distinguish tumor variants from errors) and the sample level (detect if an individual has cancer). Additionally, we investigated the effects of various UMI grouping and consensus strategies. The shearwater-AND variant calling method demonstrated the highest precision in detecting tumor-derived mutations from plasma, and reached the highest ROC-AUC of 0.984 for sample classification in tumor-informed cfDNA analyses. DREAMS-vc exhibited the highest ROC-AUC of 0.808 for sample classification in tumor-agnostic studies. We also found that sequencing depth differences in PBMCs could lead to false positives, particularly with VarScan2 and Mutect2, which was addressed by downsampling to equivalent mean depths. Additionally, network-based UMI grouping methods outperformed those using identical UMIs when all reads were retained. Our findings emphasize that the optimal variant caller depends on the study context-whether focused on mutation or sample classification, and whether conducted under tumor-informed or tumor-agnostic conditions.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAComputational BiologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMutationAgedCell-Free Nucleic AcidsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNAbenchmarkingcancer sample classificationcell-free DNAlow-frequency variant callingUMI sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39518990
PMCPMC11546253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.