ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
A Computational Pipeline Observes the Flexibility and Dynamics of Plant Cytochrome P450 Binding Sites.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Buffer Region Embedding for Hybrid Machine-Learned/Molecular-Mechanical Simulations in Complex Environments.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Unveiling the KRAS Relationship between Affinity and Dynamics: A Molecular Simulations Study.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Binding Site Vectors Enable Mapping of Cytochrome P450 Functional Landscapes.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Deriving safe limits for N-nitroso-bisoprolol by error-corrected next-generation sequencing (ecNGS) and benchmark dose (BMD) analysis, integrated with QM modeling and CYP-docking analysis.Archives of toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Binding site flexibility and dynamics strongly affect the ability of proteins to accommodate substrates and inhibitors. The significance of these properties is particularly pronounced for proteins that are inherently flexible, such as cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs). While the research on human CYPs provides detailed knowledge on both structural and functional level, such analyses are still lacking for their plant counterparts. This study aims to bridge this gap. We developed a novel computational pipeline consisting of two steps. Firstly, we use molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to capture the full conformational ensemble for a certain plant CYP. Subsequently, we developed and applied a comprehensive methodology to analyze a number of binding site properties-size, flexibility, shape, hydrophobicity, and accessibility-using the fpocket and mdpocket packages on MD-generated trajectories. The workflow was validated on human CYPs 1A2, 2A6, and 3A4, as their binding site characteristics are well known. Not only could we confirm known binding site properties, but we also identified and named previously unseen binding site channels for CYPs 1A2 and 2A6. The pipeline was then applied to plant CYPs, leading to the first categorization of 15 chosen plant CYPs based on their binding site's (dis)similarities. This study provides a foundation for the largely uncharted fields of plant CYP substrate specificity and facilitates a more precise understanding of their largely unknown specific biological functions. It offers new insights into the structural and functional dynamics of plant CYPs, which may facilitate a more accurate understanding of the fate of agrochemicals or the biotechnological design and exploitation of enzymes with specific functions. Additionally, it serves as a reference for future structural-functional analyses of CYP enzymes across various biological kingdoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.