ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
Evaluation of the Accuracy of 3D Printed Patient-Specific Brain Biopsy Guide Using 3D Volume Rendering Technique in Canine Cadavers.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a CT-based, 3D-printed, patient-specific brain biopsy guide (3D-psBBG) through the application of a transfrontal approach in canine cadavers. A total of ten canine cadavers, with weights ranging from 4.36 to 14.4 kg, were subjected to preoperative CT scans to generate 3D skull models. Customized biopsy guides were created based on these models and manufactured using 3D printing technology. Twenty spinal needle insertions were performed, and the accuracy of needle placement was evaluated through both CT and 3D volume-rendering techniques. The mean needle placement error was 2.1 mm, with no significant differences observed between insertions targeting the fronto-olfactory and piriform lobes. The 3D volume-rendering method demonstrated superior accuracy compared to the CT method, with statistically significant differences in placement errors for both targets. The average time required for the design and manufacture of the guides was 249 min. These findings indicate the high accuracy and potential clinical application of CT-based 3D-psBBG for improving diagnostic outcomes in veterinary neurology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.