Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39518879›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Digital Holographic Microscopy in Veterinary Medicine-A Feasibility Study to Analyze Label-Free Leukocytes in Blood and Milk of Dairy Cows.

Sabine Farschtschi, Manuel Lengl, Stefan Röhrl, Christian Klenk, Oliver Hayden, Klaus Diepold, Michael W Pfaffl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sabine FarschtschiDivision of Animal Physiology and Immunology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5309-6136
Manuel LenglChair of Data Processing, TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8763-6201
Stefan RöhrlChair of Data Processing, TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6277-3816
Christian KlenkHeinz-Nixdorf-Chair of Biomedical Electronics, TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, TranslaTUM, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Oliver HaydenHeinz-Nixdorf-Chair of Biomedical Electronics, TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, TranslaTUM, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2678-8663
Klaus DiepoldChair of Data Processing, TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Michael W PfafflDivision of Animal Physiology and Immunology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3192-1019

Funding

VFMF Association (Vereinigung zur Förderung der Milchwissenschaftlichen Forschung an der Technischen Universität München e. V., Freising, Germany) VFMF Association (Vereinigung zur Förderung der Milchwissenschaftlichen Forschung an der Technischen Universität München e. V., Freising, Germany)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For several years, the determination of a differential cell count of a raw milk sample has been proposed as a more accurate tool for monitoring the udder health of dairy cows compared with using the absolute somatic cell count. However, the required sample preparation and staining process can be labor- and cost-intensive. Therefore, the aim of our study was to demonstrate the feasibility of analyzing unlabeled blood and milk leukocytes from dairy cows by means of digital holographic microscopy (DHM). For this, we trained three different machine learning methods, i.e., k-Nearest Neighbor, Random Forests, and Support Vector Machine, on sorted leukocyte populations (granulocytes, lymphocytes, and monocytes/macrophages) isolated from blood and milk samples of three dairy cows by using fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Afterward, those classifiers were applied to differentiate unlabeled blood and milk samples analyzed by DHM. A total of 70 blood and 70 milk samples were used. Those samples were collected from five clinically healthy cows at 14-time points within a study period of 26 days. The outcome was compared with the results of the same samples analyzed by flow cytometry and (in the case of blood samples) also to routine analysis in an external laboratory. Moreover, a standard vaccination was used as an immune stimulus during the study to check for changes in cell morphology or cell counts. When applied to isolated leukocytes, Random Forests performed best, with a specificity of 0.93 for blood and 0.84 for milk cells and a sensitivity of 0.90 and 0.81, respectively. Although the results of the three analytical methods differed, it could be demonstrated that a DHM analysis is applicable for blood and milk leukocyte samples with high reliability. Compared with the flow cytometric results, Random Forests showed an MAE of 0.11 (SD = 0.04), an RMSE of 0.13 (SD = 0.14), and an MRE of 1.00 (SD = 1.11) for all blood leukocyte counts and an MAE of 0.20 (SD = 0.11), an RMSE of 0.21 (SD = 0.11) and an MRE of 1.95 (SD = 2.17) for all milk cell populations. Further studies with larger sample sizes and varying immune cell compositions are required to establish method-specific reference ranges.

Indexed as

dairy cowdifferential cell countdifferential leukocyte countdigital holographic microscopyimmunomonitoringimmunophenotypingsomatic cell countudder health

Identifiers

PMID39518879
PMCPMC11544890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.