Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39518860›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Microbiological Characteristics of the Gastrointestinal Tracts of Jersey and Holstein Cows.

Lei Wang, Kai Wang, Lirong Hu, Hanpeng Luo, Shangzhen Huang, Hailiang Zhang, Yao Chang, Dengke Liu, Gang Guo, Xixia Huang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lei WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Kai WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Lirong HuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Hanpeng LuoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6211-3834
Shangzhen HuangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Hailiang ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8050-2494
Yao ChangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Dengke LiuBeijing Sunlon Livestock Development Company Limited, Beijing 100029, China.
Gang GuoBeijing Sunlon Livestock Development Company Limited, Beijing 100029, China.
Xixia HuangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
Qing XuCollege of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Haidian District, Beijing 100044, China.
Yachun WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3629-2802

Funding

Major Project on Agricultural Biological Breeding 2023ZD04049National Key Research and Development Projects 2022YFE0115700The earmarked fund for CARS-36 CARS-36The Program for Changjiang Scholar and Innovation Research Team in University IRT_15R62
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gastrointestinal bacterial microbiota is essential for maintaining the health of dairy cows and ensuring their production potential, and it may also help explain the breed-related phenotypic differences. Therefore, investigating the differences in gastrointestinal bacterial microbiota between breeds is critical for deciphering the mechanisms behind these differences and exploring the potential for improving milk production by regulating the gastrointestinal bacterial microbiota. This study holistically examined the differences between rumen and hindgut bacterial microbiota in a large cohort of two breeds of dairy cows, comprising 184 Jersey cows and 165 Holstein cows. Significant distinctions were identified between the rumen and hindgut bacterial microbiota of dairy cows, with these differences being consistent across breeds. A total of 20 breed-differentiated microorganisms, comprising 14 rumen microorganisms and 6 hindgut microorganisms, were screened, which may be the primary drivers of the observed differences in lactation performance between Jersey and Holstein cows. The present study revealed the spatial heterogeneity of the gastrointestinal bacterial microbiota of Jersey and Holstein cows and identified microbial biomarkers of different breeds. These findings enhance our understanding of the differences in the gastrointestinal bacterial microbiota between Jersey and Holstein cows and may provide useful information for optimizing the composition of the intestinal bacterial microbiota of the two breeds of dairy cows.

Indexed as

gastrointestinal microbiomeHolstein cowsJersey cows

Identifiers

PMID39518860
PMCPMC11545411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.