ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Planning Accuracy and Stem Offset Assessment in Digital Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Planning in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional and artificial intelligence-assisted preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Review
- Article
- The accuracy of artificial intelligence in 3D preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Accuracy of digital templating for total hip arthroplasty: android smartphone and tablet computer versus commercial templating software.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2025Article
- The efficiency of patient-specific instrumentation and technological assistance in cementless total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Stem design affects templating adherence in total hip arthroplasty - a retrospective cohort study comparing two types of cementless short stems.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Efficiency and Applicability of Virtual Surgical Planning in Maxillofacial and Mandibular Bone Reconstruction: A Narrative Review.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.