ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Biliary Reconstruction with Hepaticoduodenostomy Versus Hepaticojejunostomy After Choledochal Cyst Resection: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technical feasibility should not outweigh long-term outcomes in biliary reconstruction for children.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Limited resection and hepaticoduodenostomy for Bismuth type II hilar cholangiocarcinoma in a frail diabetic patient: a feasible oncologic alternative.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Surgical management strategies and postoperative outcomes of choledochal cysts in children: the role of preoperative radiological assessment in a retrospective observational study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic hepaticoduodenostomy for bilioenteric reconstruction: an experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Surgical Challenges Posed by Anomalous Biliary Tree Anatomy in Choledochal Cyst Excision: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Presentation and outcomes of surgery for choledochal cyst in children and adults: an experience of 329 cases.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluating surgical strategies for pediatric congenital choledochal cysts: a multicenter retrospective study and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Choledochal cysts (CCs), a congenital anomaly resulting in the abnormal dilation of the biliary ductal system, are most often identified in patients younger than 10 years of age. Regardless of clinical presentation, the cornerstone of therapy for CCs is complete surgical excision with reconstruction with either hepaticoduodenostomy or hepaticojejunostomy. Although both procedures are used by surgeons for the correction of CCs, evidence on clinical outcomes following both approaches is inconclusive as to which may offer superior reconstruction. This narrative review aims to compare the current literature regarding both approaches by evaluating their anatomic and operative considerations, as well as their perioperative, postoperative, and long-term outcomes. Future studies should closely focus on long-term, comparative outcomes, including the risk of biliary malignancy, and refine techniques to minimize complications, such as biliary reflux and bowel obstruction, in order to improve care for pediatric patients undergoing treatment for CCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.