Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39518674›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Clinical Outcomes of Tube Feeding vs. Hand Feeding in Advanced Dementia.

Wei Yu Chua, Eng-King Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wei Yu ChuaYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
Eng-King TanDepartment of Neurology, Singapore General Hospital Campus, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore 308433, Singapore.

Funding

National Medical Research Council OF-LCG000207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia is a growing public health issue, with the number of cases projected to triple by 2050 as society ages. Although the American Geriatrics Society recommends careful hand feeding over tube feeding for patients with advanced dementia, an increasing proportion of patients are receiving tube feeding. Although decisions regarding tube feeding are often based on the physician, recent studies have shown that tube feeding has significant implications for clinical outcomes and quality of life. Tube feeding is associated with an increased risk of mortality, pneumonia and the use of restraints. Although tube feeding may reduce caregiver burden, it does not improve survival or nutritional status and incurs significant financial costs. Caregivers that hand feed patients often experience stress, particularly in regions where support services are limited. However, there are various strategies available to promote hand feeding which include environmental interventions, mealtime assistance and caregiver training. Although hand feeding is the most comfortable option for patients, the frequency of mealtimes and financial and mental health impact on caregivers requires the physician to conduct a holistic assessment of the patient when deciding on the mode of feeding for patients with advanced dementia.

Indexed as

agingdementiafeedingoutcomespublic health

Identifiers

PMID39518674
PMCPMC11545848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.