ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Sequelae of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: From Post-Pulmonary Embolism Functional Impairment to Chronic Thromboembolic Disease.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk stratification in pulmonary embolism: current evidence and future directions.The Journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2026Review
- Clonal Hematopoiesis (CHIP) in Pulmonary Embolism and CTEPH: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Risk Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Recent advances in risk stratification and treatment of acute pulmonary embolism.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Dyspnea after a first episode of pulmonary embolism: prevalence, predictors and long-term associations with health-related quality of life.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Immunomodulation and Thrombolytic Approaches in the Management of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism.Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among survivors of acute pulmonary embolism (PE), roughly half report persistent dyspnea, impaired functional status, and decreased quality of life. Post-pulmonary embolism syndrome (PPES) is a broad condition which has been increasingly recognized in recent years and may be due to post-pulmonary embolism functional impairment, chronic thromboembolic disease, or the most severe long-term complication of PE, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Despite guideline recommendations for appropriate follow-up for post-pulmonary embolism patients, PPES remains underrecognized and diagnostic testing underutilized. Patients with symptoms suggestive of PPES at follow-up should undergo a transthoracic echocardiogram to screen for the presence of pulmonary hypertension; additional testing, such as a ventilation/perfusion scan, right heart catheterization, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing may be indicated. The pathophysiology of post-pulmonary embolism syndrome is complex and heterogeneous. In chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, the pathophysiology reflects persistent pulmonary arterial thrombi and a progressive small vessel vasculopathy. In patients with chronic thromboembolic disease or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, medical therapy, balloon pulmonary angioplasty, or pulmonary thromboendarterectomy should be considered, and in cases of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary thromboendarterectomy significantly improves mortality. In all causes of post-pulmonary embolism syndrome, rehabilitation is a safe treatment option that may improve quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.